President Donald Trump raged against New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani on Wednesday, implying that, depending on the outcome of the November election, he may utilize federal powers to assert control over the city.

“As President of the United States, I’m not going to let this Communist Lunatic destroy New York. Rest assured, I hold all the levers, and have all the cards. I’ll save New York City, and make it “Hot” and “Great” again, just like I did with the Good Ol’ USA!” Trump wrote on X.

Trump also threatened to examine Mamdani’s legal status and arrest him if he stood in the way of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in the city.

Mamdani’s unexpected victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary in June has sparked significant concern among Republicans, who see the 33-year-old democratic socialist as a potent symbol of a shifting political landscape.

Mamdani’s rise from a relatively unknown state assemblyman to the presumptive Democratic nominee for mayor of America’s largest city has worried many, not just Republicans.

Mamdani is drawing fire for a campaign strategy plan that expressly advocates for transferring the city’s tax burden to “richer and whiter neighborhoods.”

A policy document titled “Stop the Squeeze on NYC Homeowners” from Mamdani’s mayoral campaign website contends that the city’s current property tax system disproportionately benefits wealthy, White homeowners, particularly in Manhattan and affluent Brooklyn, by allowing them to pay far less in taxes due to outdated assessment caps.

In contrast, Black, Latino, and immigrant homeowners in communities like Brownsville and Jamaica in Queens’ outer boroughs are overloaded and more likely to face foreclosure.

His solution?

“Shift the tax burden from overtaxed homeowners in the outer boroughs to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods,”

the proposal reads. “The property tax system is unbalanced because assessment levels are artificially capped, so homeowners in expensive neighborhoods pay less than their fair share.”

The idea would cut the taxable share of assessed property prices citywide while increasing real tax rates in affluent regions.

The end consequence is reduced tax bills for low-income communities and higher ones for wealthier districts, which the campaign refers to as “richer and whiter.”

The campaign document also emphasizes racial differences in deed theft and “tangled titles,” which are circumstances in which someone lives in a house they feel they own (usually through inheritance),

but their name is not on the deed, causing legal confusion regarding ownership.

According to the paper, largely Black areas confront these difficulties at a far higher rate than White neighborhoods.

To solve this, Mamdani is proposing a $10 million “Tangled Title Fund” to assist city inhabitants in hiring attorneys and clearing legal titles, allowing them to acquire full ownership rights and advantages.

Mamdani is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, and his preamble explains how to “end white supremacy and racial oppression because its destruction is in the interest of all workers, including white workers.”

Overall, the housing study describes the city’s housing disparities as fundamentally racist and economically unfair.

The petition also alleges that the city’s tax lien auction mechanism is exploitative and discriminatory. When a homeowner falls behind on property taxes under the arrangement, the city often sells the debt to a private trust of Wall Street-backed investors at a discount. Rather than collecting the debt immediately.

Mamdani claims that he will abolish the system on his first day in office and establish a new tax-collecting system that gives “additional opportunities” for homeowners to enroll in payment plans, pay down their debt, and remain in their houses.

The Queens assemblyman proposes building 200,000 new publicly funded affordable dwellings and immediately freezing rents for the city’s 2.4 million stable renters.

His plans include multi-year rent controls and huge investment in public housing. Critics say that his initiatives might exacerbate existing rental market issues.