The strike that toppled Nicolás Maduro stunned the world—and blindsided Congress.
In a single night, U.S. forces redrew Venezuela’s
future and ignited a constitutional firestorm at home
. Now Washington is turning on itself.
A quiet senator is forcing a historic showdown
over who gets to decide war.
As America nears its 250th birthday,
the real battle is in its ow… Continues…
The operation in Venezuela ended quickly,
but its political aftershocks in Washington did not.
Senator Tim Kaine’s push for a war powers
vote forced colleagues to confront a question
many had long preferred to dodge: whether they
were willing to reclaim the authority the Constitution gives them,
or accept that modern war is made by presidents alone.
For some, the issue was less about Venezuela
than about a slow, decades‑long erosion
of congressional courage.
As lawmakers weighed the resolution, memories
of past interventions in Latin America, secret operations,
and open-ended authorizations colored the debate
. Supporters of executive flexibility warned against “tying the commander in chief’s hands,”
while critics insisted that speed cannot replace consent.
In the end, the fight over this single mission became
a proxy for something larger: whether a self‑governing
republic can still pause, argue, and choose before it goes to war.
