Authorities investigating the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie have determined that a recently reported message claiming to be connected to her case is not credible. The Pima County Sheriff’s Department shared the update after investigators reviewed information about the message with the FBI. Officials are continuing to encourage the public to report suspicious communications and avoid responding to unverified claims.

Authorities have issued an additional warning about potential scams connected to the case. They advise people not to send money or disclose personal information in response to unsolicited messages. Such precautions can help individuals protect themselves from misleading claims and financial requests that have not been verified by investigators.

Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of NBC Today show co-host Savannah Guthrie, was reported missing after she did not attend church as expected. She was last seen at her home in the Catalina Foothills area near Tucson, Arizona, on the evening of January 31. Her family contacted authorities the following day when they realized she was missing.

During the investigation, several media organizations reportedly received communications claiming to be connected to the disappearance. Authorities have previously indicated that some messages were considered illegitimate attempts to obtain money. Investigators have reviewed available information and encouraged anyone with potentially relevant details to share them through official channels.

Law enforcement agencies have also released photographs and video footage connected to the investigation in an effort to gather additional information. The case remains an active matter for authorities, who continue to assess information and follow up on relevant leads. Officials are asking the public to rely on verified updates from law enforcement and avoid spreading unsupported claims about the circumstances of the disappearance.

Anyone with information that could assist investigators should contact the appropriate law enforcement agency. People who receive suspicious messages should preserve the relevant information and report it to authorities without sending money or sharing sensitive details. Official updates remain the most reliable source for information about the investigation.

The assessment of a message is a specific development within the investigation, rather than an answer to every question about the disappearance. Determining that one communication is not credible does not establish who sent other messages or explain where Nancy is. Those issues should remain separate. The update described here concerns the review of a claim and the warning that unverified communications may expose people to deception.

Public attention can make a case more visible while also attracting misleading material. A message that invokes a missing person’s name may sound urgent or emotionally compelling, particularly to someone following the family’s situation closely. The source’s warning addresses that pressure directly. Urgency should not replace the need to establish who is communicating and whether authorities recognize the information as genuine.

The ongoing appeal for relevant details leaves an appropriate role for the public. Information can be preserved and passed to official investigators without responding to demands or spreading a claim as fact. That approach keeps potentially useful material available for assessment and avoids turning a suspicious message into another layer of confusion. The account ends with an active investigation, not a confirmed resolution, and the distinction remains essential to understanding the update.